A question was raised earlier about if I have ID
The official and legal answer, is no.
The unofficial answer, is yes.
Here in Ontario we get things called "health cards".
Looks like this. Has your name and a picture.
I use it for "ID" just about any place that wants "ID"
There's a problem with this.
The government really does not like people doing that.
In fact, the government has specific regulations/laws that say that nobody HAS to take a health card as ID. The only people who do are OHIP, the Ontario Health Insurance Plan. When you go to the doctors, they swipe your card, and the government pays.
I also have a birth certificate.
On the back it says "LAMINATION VOIDS THIS CERTIFICATE"
My mother laminated it in 1985
Again, most places don't care.
The problem is most is not enough.
The government's voter ID laws were written to allow people like me to vote. My ODSP (social assistance) stub (for my payment) has my address on it. So, my ODSP stub and my OHIP card, combined, were accepted, and I voted.
The problem I've had is with the bank.
The government decided to increase the requirements to open a bank account, and they require 2 pieces of valid ID. I don't have that.
As such, I was expected to talk for 2 hours to the nearest branch to withdraw my social assistance money.
Fortunately, my bank card from that bank (which did not work) IS acceptable ID for some reason, and so, my current bank account works fine.
So, you may be asking
why don't you just get "valid ID"
Here's why
To get that I need to get it from the government
The government is the only one who has a problem with my birth certificate
That means I need a new one.
I have both ADHD and Aspergers, and the paperwork for birth certificates has a unique ability to send me into a panic.
The best part is that for it to be accepted, you need a "guarantor"
This is a person like a doctor or a lawyer, etc, that you've known for 2 years.
Might not sound like much, but I moved 18 months ago.
I don't have any qualifying persons who I've known for 2 years.
Even with all the money, I simply CAN NOT get a valid ID.
So
We wait
Lets presume I do make it to the point where I can get one.
Well my guarantor would be my doctor.
Doctors can charge for signing any paper. That means my doctor can charge me money just to sign on the dotted line. Normally this is waived, but it can be as much as $60
Then I need to apply for a birth certificate. This can cost as much as $60
Once I get one, I need to use it to apply for ID. That's $70
When you live on $1100 a month, $200 for an ID is not something to laugh at. Especially when rent,
Additionally, while $70 will get me a non-drivers licence ID that is just as valid as a drivers lic, I need a drivers licence, as my father is getting too old to drive. This means I'll also need to pay for whatever to get that process over with.
So
To answer the question, no, I don't have an ID, and getting one is not a simple thing especially when I'd need to spend half my money on the process.
Saturday, December 31, 2016
when is new years?
all times local to me
4am - Line Islands
6am - New Zealand
8am - Sydney
10am - Japan
11am - Hong Kong
1:30pm - India
4pm - Moscow
7pm - UK
9pm - Brazil
New Years - Here
3am - California
5am - Hawaii
7am - Baker Island
4am - Line Islands
6am - New Zealand
8am - Sydney
10am - Japan
11am - Hong Kong
1:30pm - India
4pm - Moscow
7pm - UK
9pm - Brazil
New Years - Here
3am - California
5am - Hawaii
7am - Baker Island
Thursday, December 29, 2016
RULES
The rules for this channel are:
There aren't any.
Don't interpret that to mean that you are encouraged to be a dick. If you are an asshole, you are an asshole, the rules don't fucking care if you are an asshole, nor do they encourage you to be an asshole. Being a fucking cunt is unrelated to the rules. If you are a fucking cunt, that's your problem.
(note as well that channel rules and synIRC rules are unrelated; this channel is on synIRC, and as such, you have to follow synIRC rules. If you have a problem with those rules, take it up with synIRC.)
There aren't any.
Don't interpret that to mean that you are encouraged to be a dick. If you are an asshole, you are an asshole, the rules don't fucking care if you are an asshole, nor do they encourage you to be an asshole. Being a fucking cunt is unrelated to the rules. If you are a fucking cunt, that's your problem.
(note as well that channel rules and synIRC rules are unrelated; this channel is on synIRC, and as such, you have to follow synIRC rules. If you have a problem with those rules, take it up with synIRC.)
Monday, December 26, 2016
congrats to hrc
for winning the election with 2,865,075 votes (or more)
That's more votes than were cast in any US Presidential election prior to 1828
(which is 1,407,552 FTR)
So she beat George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, and John Quincy Adams combined!!
She also beat...
Andrew Jackson from 1828; who took only 642,553 votes
Andrew Jackson from 1832; with 701,780 votes
Van Buren, in 1836; with 764,176
Harrison, 1840; 1,275,390
Polk, 1844; 1,339,494
Taylor, 1848; 1,363,393
Pierce, 1852; 1,607,510
Buchanan, 1856; 1,836,072
Lincoln, 1860; 1,865,908
and
Lincoln, 1864; 2,218,388
HRC didn't win by a larger margin than Grant, however, who took 3,013,421 votes.
However, her margin of victory was WAY larger than Tilden won over Hayes in 1876, when he won by a mere ~250,000 votes
Of course Tilden did beat Hayes by 3%, whereas Clinton only beat Trump by 2%
but who is counting percentage points when we can count raw ballots! I mean the raw ballots make it clear that George Washington was the least popular president EVER.
That's more votes than were cast in any US Presidential election prior to 1828
(which is 1,407,552 FTR)
So she beat George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, and John Quincy Adams combined!!
She also beat...
Andrew Jackson from 1828; who took only 642,553 votes
Andrew Jackson from 1832; with 701,780 votes
Van Buren, in 1836; with 764,176
Harrison, 1840; 1,275,390
Polk, 1844; 1,339,494
Taylor, 1848; 1,363,393
Pierce, 1852; 1,607,510
Buchanan, 1856; 1,836,072
Lincoln, 1860; 1,865,908
and
Lincoln, 1864; 2,218,388
HRC didn't win by a larger margin than Grant, however, who took 3,013,421 votes.
However, her margin of victory was WAY larger than Tilden won over Hayes in 1876, when he won by a mere ~250,000 votes
Of course Tilden did beat Hayes by 3%, whereas Clinton only beat Trump by 2%
but who is counting percentage points when we can count raw ballots! I mean the raw ballots make it clear that George Washington was the least popular president EVER.
Just a reminder
In the context of my budget, and other stuff, that I suffer from:
Depression
Aspergers / Autism
"ADHD Symptoms"
"Many symptoms from OCD"
and Dysgraphia
all officially doctor diagnosed, paperwork and all.
Food and Internet is how I combat my depression. Those things will not be cut (from my budget). I'd rather be homeless.
Depression
Aspergers / Autism
"ADHD Symptoms"
"Many symptoms from OCD"
and Dysgraphia
all officially doctor diagnosed, paperwork and all.
Food and Internet is how I combat my depression. Those things will not be cut (from my budget). I'd rather be homeless.
Friday, December 23, 2016
electoral votes
305 VICE Mike Pence (R)
304 PREZ Donald Trump (R)
227 PREZ Hillary Clinton (D)
227 VICE Tim Kaine (D)
003 PREZ Colin Powell (R)
002 VICE Elizabeth Warren (D)
001 PREZ Bernie Sanders (I)
001 PREZ John Kaisch (R)
001 PREZ Ron Paul (L)
001 PREZ Faith Spotted Eagle (I)
001 VICE Susan Collins (R)
001 VICE Maria Cantwell (D)
001 VICE Carly Fiorina (R)
001 VICE Winona LaDuke (G)
304 PREZ Donald Trump (R)
227 PREZ Hillary Clinton (D)
227 VICE Tim Kaine (D)
003 PREZ Colin Powell (R)
002 VICE Elizabeth Warren (D)
001 PREZ Bernie Sanders (I)
001 PREZ John Kaisch (R)
001 PREZ Ron Paul (L)
001 PREZ Faith Spotted Eagle (I)
001 VICE Susan Collins (R)
001 VICE Maria Cantwell (D)
001 VICE Carly Fiorina (R)
001 VICE Winona LaDuke (G)
Wednesday, December 21, 2016
banzored
So some idiot got banned.
When they banned him they listed 2 reasons; the first of which sounded good enough to re-ban this person to me on it's own.
The second was "because you've been around long enough that you should know X"
I literally worked with a guy who was fired because of that argument once.
That he should know X because he's been around "long enough"
Not only he did not know, nobody else I worked with knew, including me, or people around longer.
I really don't give a fuck about the guy who was banzored, in fact, I don't understand why they unbanned him in the first place.
I just don't want to end up banned myself because somebody thinks I know something I do not know.
When they banned him they listed 2 reasons; the first of which sounded good enough to re-ban this person to me on it's own.
The second was "because you've been around long enough that you should know X"
I literally worked with a guy who was fired because of that argument once.
That he should know X because he's been around "long enough"
Not only he did not know, nobody else I worked with knew, including me, or people around longer.
I really don't give a fuck about the guy who was banzored, in fact, I don't understand why they unbanned him in the first place.
I just don't want to end up banned myself because somebody thinks I know something I do not know.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)