After the 2007 Ontario election, I went for halloween as John Tory.
See Tory was scary, real scary. He was gonna school the something. I don't remember all the details.
Very scary, he was, so scary in fact, he lost the election!!
As such, I'd like to go out in 2015 as another politician, but I'm torn.
Should I go as Scary Stephen Harper, who was so scary, we tossed him
Or should I go as Scary Thomas Mulcair, who was so scary, all the progressives abandoned him
Please give me your feedback on twitter!
Wednesday, October 28, 2015
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Wikipedia is always right
And I can prove it:
Lets say something that is wrong is on wikipedia.
I will outline all possibilities and show how it's right.
1 - You do nothing about it. In effect, this is admitting it is right, thus making it right. If you have a problem with it, edit it, or shut the hell up. I won't waste my time on people who want to be preachy, which is exactly what you are if you refuse to back up your claims with action.
2 - You edit it to no longer be "wrong" but to be "right"
Great!!
Now lets examine what can happen from here.
1 - Nobody challenges it.
If so, congrats! You've proven you are right.
2 - It gets challenged.
Great!!
Now lets examine what can happen from here.
1 - You win the fight
If so, congrats! You've again, proven you are right.
2 - You lose the right.
If this happens it means that there were enough people out there, with information and data to make an argument that was strong enough to beat you. This means your argument, therefore, must not hold much water. If you truly were "right" one of the above things would have happened, but, it did not, and as such, your argument, to be blunt, but not be worth much of anything.
As such, if you can't get your argument past Wikipedia, I have no time for it.
Lets say something that is wrong is on wikipedia.
I will outline all possibilities and show how it's right.
1 - You do nothing about it. In effect, this is admitting it is right, thus making it right. If you have a problem with it, edit it, or shut the hell up. I won't waste my time on people who want to be preachy, which is exactly what you are if you refuse to back up your claims with action.
2 - You edit it to no longer be "wrong" but to be "right"
Great!!
Now lets examine what can happen from here.
1 - Nobody challenges it.
If so, congrats! You've proven you are right.
2 - It gets challenged.
Great!!
Now lets examine what can happen from here.
1 - You win the fight
If so, congrats! You've again, proven you are right.
2 - You lose the right.
If this happens it means that there were enough people out there, with information and data to make an argument that was strong enough to beat you. This means your argument, therefore, must not hold much water. If you truly were "right" one of the above things would have happened, but, it did not, and as such, your argument, to be blunt, but not be worth much of anything.
As such, if you can't get your argument past Wikipedia, I have no time for it.
Tuesday, October 20, 2015
Skyview
So, as I knew all along, I was right about Skyview.
I'll be hunting down those who said I was crazy, just to tell them
Fuck you
So if you looked at my projection sand said
"Naw, I can't see the Liberals winning Skyview"
I have one thing to say to you
You are entitled to your own opinion.
And if you looked and said
"No, that will never happen"
You are still entitled to your own opinion.
And if you looked and said
"LOL!!! no way. What are you fucking nuts? Jesus christ. Do you know the first fucking god damn thing about politics? LOL! What a stupid asshole"
Fuck you
I will find you
And I will ensure you know just how wrong you were.
I'll be hunting down those who said I was crazy, just to tell them
Fuck you
So if you looked at my projection sand said
"Naw, I can't see the Liberals winning Skyview"
I have one thing to say to you
You are entitled to your own opinion.
And if you looked and said
"No, that will never happen"
You are still entitled to your own opinion.
And if you looked and said
"LOL!!! no way. What are you fucking nuts? Jesus christ. Do you know the first fucking god damn thing about politics? LOL! What a stupid asshole"
Fuck you
I will find you
And I will ensure you know just how wrong you were.
Thursday, October 1, 2015
Why I've delayed a ToP update
Why did I delay updating this
http://teddyonpolitics.blogspot.ca/
Simple
Readership.
I have about 20 people who read the blog. 45 at most.
Facing "Blogposting" in competing for my time is "Complaining on the internet" - always fun - as well as my current job (paperboy) and a potential future job as a computer tech.
I don't blog about politics for no reason. I hope that one day people will come to me for my thoughts. Be that on TV where they look to me for info about ridings and the such, or by the candidates who want to know how to win an election.
I also like to be entertained, we all do. I like playing computer games and socializing.
When balancing all those out, I see I don't have the time to do all of those today properly. Thus, one of them must fall by the wayside.
And with only 20 readers, it is the blog that falls by the wayside.
If it were 200 readers, I might have re-considred. 2000 and I'd have skipped some gaming despite the joy it brings, 20000 and I might also have told the people at the forum I moderate to shove it. 200000 and I'd have told my current job to shove it. 2000000 and I'd would not need this new job as I'd be applying for work with the CBC and the Leaders.
http://teddyonpolitics.blogspot.ca/
Simple
Readership.
I have about 20 people who read the blog. 45 at most.
Facing "Blogposting" in competing for my time is "Complaining on the internet" - always fun - as well as my current job (paperboy) and a potential future job as a computer tech.
I don't blog about politics for no reason. I hope that one day people will come to me for my thoughts. Be that on TV where they look to me for info about ridings and the such, or by the candidates who want to know how to win an election.
I also like to be entertained, we all do. I like playing computer games and socializing.
When balancing all those out, I see I don't have the time to do all of those today properly. Thus, one of them must fall by the wayside.
And with only 20 readers, it is the blog that falls by the wayside.
If it were 200 readers, I might have re-considred. 2000 and I'd have skipped some gaming despite the joy it brings, 20000 and I might also have told the people at the forum I moderate to shove it. 200000 and I'd have told my current job to shove it. 2000000 and I'd would not need this new job as I'd be applying for work with the CBC and the Leaders.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)